Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 14:02
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Milky Way galaxy might not collide with Andromeda after all - Ars Technica
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All international travelers should get measles vaccinations, CDC says - AP News
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Elon Musk’s Reign of Corruption Chronicled in Elizabeth Warren Report - Rolling Stone
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is the most inappropriate experience you have had with a friend's daughter?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ancient Protein Breaks Biological Rules by Working in a Mirror World - SciTechDaily
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.